Scientific logic to evaluate the claim of a successful therapeutic effect in the Epidemic of Chikungunya in the year 2006
| Whether the so-called disease is a case of Chikungunya | Yes |
| Whether the disease (Chikungunya) has epidemic features and whether the local epidemic coincides with the features and time of occurrence in other areas | yes |
| What was the diagnosis given by the other qualified doctors? | Chikungunya |
| What is the duration of suffering | Few weeks to months and years |
| Whether it has any known cure or prevention in any system of medicine | No knowledge |
| What was the treatment received by the majority before taking DAHT | Allopathy |
| How was the recovery with their treatment? | No lasting relief, with allopathy severe pains persisted |
| What was the type of medicine given by NLHC under DAHT and if it has any side effects | Nosode prepared from the blood of the same person, No side effects |
| When was the therapeutic effect perceived with DAHT | Fever subsided in one day & Joint Pains in 2-4 days |
| Whether the recovery is smooth and lasting | yes |
| Whether there was any recurrence of the suffering | no |
| Number of people treated | 86 |
| Number of people recovered | 86 |
| Whether the recovery is uniform in all the people | Yes, Uniform |
| Whether the effect is repeatable in the same disease or other viral diseases | Yes, treated other viral diseases successfully |
| Whether there was any preventive role/benefit | Yes, School students were given a preventive dose successfully |
| What is the fate of people who did not take this treatment? | The fever subsided in a few days but severe pains persisted for months |
| Whether they belonged to the same epidemic and same location with the same features | yes |